The 1990s was a trend for classic Horror movies getting remakes since “Cape Fear” including “Dracula,” “Wolf,” “The Haunting,” “House on Haunted Hill,” Gus Van Sant’s horrendous remake of “Psycho” and a childhood classic growing up, “The Mummy.” The trend ended in 2000 when Gerald Butler as “Dracula” & “Hollow Man” came out. Then, Hollywood studios decide to produce American remakes of Japanese Horror. Most notably, “The Ring.”
After Francis Ford Coppola produced and directed a faithful adaptation of Dracula, he declined to direct another remake. So, he sticked as an executive producer. Offered Kenneth Branagh the director’s chair. He accepted the job. Robert De Niro (pre-hate boner Trump fanatic) signed on to portray The Monster. Frank Darabont adapted Mary Shelley’s book retaining elements of her vision.
Released in 1994, (same year The Crow came out) it received mixed reviews from critics. As you may know, Guillermo Del Toro’s upcoming interpretation of Frankenstein starring Oscar Isaac & Jacob Elordi will stream on October 17, 2025. Now that it’s Halloween Month, I’ll be watching and reviewing Horror films to get into the Halloween spirit. By the way, Christian Bale will also play Frankenstein in Maggie Gyllenhaal’s “The Bride.” It’ll be released on March 6, 2026.
I won’t give away the ending. I know many of us are aware Frankenstein’s been referenced or parodied and other works. The 1994 remake is unique.
Alive & Dead Qualities
Alive: Kenneth “Ken” Branagh did a superb job directing a faithful adaptation of Frankenstein. He also portrayed Victor Frankenstein.
Robert “Bobby” De Niro did a fantastic job for his performance as The Monster.
Other Cast Members such as Tim Burton’s ex, Helena Bonham Carter, Tom Hulce, (Quasimodo from Disney’s The Hunchback of Notre Dame) John Cleese & Ian Holm all did a decent job for their respective performances.
Fun Facts
- Ken & Helena married the same year the remake came out. They divorced five years later. Plus, they went on to appear in separate Harry Potter films.
- Before Mr. De Niro played The Monster, Andy Garcia was considered for the role.
Frank Darabont (The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile, The Mist) wrote the script.
Francis Ford Coppola served as an executive producer courtesy of his production company, American Zoetrope.
Ken’s frequent collaborator, Patrick Doyle (Hamlet 1996, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Rise of the Planet of the Apes) orchestrated the soundtrack.
Practical Effects were heavily involved.
Prosthetic Makeup transformed Bobby into The Monster.
Pacing didn’t feel like a drab or fast as Road Runner passing a stop sign. I was hooked right from the get-go.
Cinematography’s shot in stable condition.
Unlike the 1931 version, The Monster’s involved in the Opening Scene when he attacks dogs offscreen.. I know what you’re thinking. “But, Nick The Monster doesn’t appear later.” Technically, he does. Because Victor was discovered by a sea crew at The North Pole. Then, flashback to a year prior to Victor making The Monster. Similar to one of my all-time favorite films, “Fight Club.” When the film goes back in time prior to the first scene.
Like the OG Universal Monsters, Victor said the famous line, “It’ alive.”
Victor also said, “What have I done.” A cliche line, but it never gets old.
The remake is authentic retaining elements of Mary Shelley’s vision. But there’s a catch. Kenneth & Frank took a few creative liberties on the source material. It ain’t easy adapting a book. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt.
An interesting take on The Monster. For instance, a moment with The Monster watching a blind man and his family. He adapts to his environment as a result of having the brain of Victor’s mentor, Professor Waldman. He also had a conversation with the blind man.
Victor’s fiancée, Elizabeth has more prominence than her lackluster characterization from the 1931 version. Victor & Elizabeth knew each other since childhood.
More details surrounding Victor’s early years in medical school. Influenced by the death of his mother, Victor intends to bring people back from the dead by using various body parts to reanimate a grotesque corpse. The 1931 version lacked a three-dimensional protagonist so the audience can root for him.
Primary Themes are Resurrection, Science, Nature vs. Nature & Humanity. Each one’s handled maturely.
As we all know in many adaptations, The Monster dies at the end. This time, it’s a bittersweet ending. I don’t give it away.
Dead: Scare Factor lacks legitimate scares. I wasn’t petrified. I had a similar complaint with the 1931 version. Pretty jarring for Mr. Branagh to adapt a faithful iteration of the book. At least The Mummy 1999 had some scary moments, but at the same time a fun action-adventure like Indiana Jones.
The Final Verdict: A-
I consider Kenneth Branagh’s version as my favorite interpretation of Frankenstein. If it had scary moments, I would’ve given it my highest grade, an A, FOR APEX! An A- will do. Like I said, it ain’t easy adapting a book. If you’re prepping up for Guillermo Del Toro’s iteration, check out the 1994 version.
Nickthemoviecritic.com 
Excellent and insightful review! You’ve perfectly captured the unique position this 1994 adaptation holds. It’s a fascinating film—flawed, but arguably the most ambitious and literarily faithful take on Shelley’s novel put to screen. Your point about it being a “bittersweet” character drama rather than a straight horror film is spot on; its strengths lie in its performances and thematic weight, not in jump scares. A great choice for a Halloween month watch that prioritizes substance over sheer terror.
LikeLike